Travelers' Insurance v. Healey
New York Supreme Court
Action of interpleader and to determine conflicting claims to a policy of life insurance. •
1Opinion of the CourtChester, J.
This action has been tried once before and resulted in a judgment that the action was properly brought; that the defendants Ann Healey, Starks A. Doty and Carrie E. Doty had no interest in the policy sued upon; that the firm of Peterson & Packer were the holders of the-policy and entitled to the moneys payable thereunder whenever they should elect to exercise the option thereby given to the holder to convert the policy into cash under the terms thereof. Travelers’ Ins. Co. v. Healey, 28 N. Y. Supp. 478.
An appeal was taken from this judgment to the General Term which resulted in a reversal and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilson v. . LittleNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
- Merrill v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Walsh v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Smillie v. . QuinnNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Leinkauf v. . CalmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Janesville State Bank v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Zeigler v. Kansas Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- La Spina v. Pennsylvania RailroadAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910
- Travelers' Insurance v. HealeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898