Legal Opinion
Peel v. Reibel
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 16, 1939No. 32,056PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Stone, Justice.
The one issue is whether plaintiff, in her own right as donee from the insured of a policy of life insurance, or the administrator of the estate of the deceased insured, is entitled to the proceeds of the policy. The verdict was for plaintiff. Defendant appeals from the order denying his alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial.
As of August 1, 1937, the First National Bank of St. Paul insured the lives of a group of its employes under a “group” policy issued by the Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Company. The “master policy” was issued and delivered to the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ward v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Redden v. Prudential Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Janesville State Bank v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Rahders, Merritt & Hagler v. People's BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ohio National Life Assurance v. Steven EgbertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- PHL Variable Insurance Company v. Bank of UtahCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Butterworth v. Mississippi Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Bimestefer v. BimesteferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- John W. Parker v. Sid CanhamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.