Legal Opinion
ASCOLESE v. SHOEMAKER CONSTRUCTION CO.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 19, 2021No. 2:18-cv-01864Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : DON ASCOLESE, : CIVIL ACTION : : Plaintiff, : : v. : No. 18-1864 : SHOEMAKER CONSTRUCTION CO., : et al., : : Defendants. : : Goldberg, J. April 19, 2021 MEMORANDUM OPINION This is a qui tam action brought on behalf of the United States of America under the False Claims Act (“FCA”) by Plaintiff-Relator Don Ascolese (“Relator”). Relator alleges that Defendants Shoemaker Construction Co. (“Shoemaker”), Shoemaker Synterra, a JV1 (“SSAJV”),2 and McDonough Bolyard Peck (“MBP”) engaged in a scheme to defraud the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Burtch v. Milberg Factors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Lincoln Benefit Life Co. v. AEI Life, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.