Legal Opinion

Cockings v. Austin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 9, 1995No. 77703PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATT, Justice:

This appeal arises from the latest of five suits involving Appellant, William R. Austin, and Appellees, Ronald W. Cockings and his wife Bonnie H. Cockings. The parties’ relationship began in August 1984, when they agreed to set up a corporation to purchase Troxell Auto Parts in Shawnee, Oklahoma. They formed their corporation, and named it Troxell Parts. Austin owned one-half the shares. The other half were owned by the Cockings.

Austin was a Shawnee businessman, and Ronald Cockings was vice president of a Shawnee bank where Austin did business. Austin and Cockings agreed that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Erwin v. FrazierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. United General Insurance Co. v. Crane Carrier Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  3. Loper v. AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  4. Lee v. HarveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  5. Richards v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cardon v. Jean Brown ResearchCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  2. Hausler v. FeltonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API