Legal Opinion
Harvey v. Blockbuster, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 8, 2005No. Civ.A.05-1606 (MLC)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COOPER, District Judge.
The plaintiffs brought this action in state court to recover civil penalties and for a permanent injunction under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act (“NJCFA”) and regulations promulgated thereunder. (Compl., at 2-12.) The defendant — Blockbuster, Inc. (“BBI”), which is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Texas — removed the action to this Court under (i) 28 U.S.C. § (“Section”) 1332(a)(1), and (ii) the Class Action Fairness Act, Sections 1332(d)(1)(B) and (2)(A). (Rmvl. Not., at 2-6.) 1
The plaintiffs move to remand the action…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Alfred L. Snapp & Son, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Ex Rel. BarezSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stone v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Highway Comm. of Wyoming v. Utah Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Nuclear Engineering Company v. William J. Scott, Illinois Ex Rel. William J. Scott v. Nuclear Engineering CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Development Finance Corporation the National Housing and Health Care Trust, Inc. v. Alpha Housing & Health Care, Inc. v. John Sower Wilbur Dove, Third Party Sylvan Associates, Inc., ( Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Frazier v. Pioneer Americas LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Louisiana Ex Rel. Caldwell v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Werner v. KPMG LLPDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- Plummer v. Farmers Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2005
- In re Vioxx Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.