Legal Opinion

In re Vioxx Products Liability Litigation

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided January 3, 2012No. MDL No. 1657PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER & REASONS

ELDON C. FALLON, District Judge.

Currently pending before the Court is the Commonwealth of Kentucky’s Motion to Remand (Rec. Doc. 63194). The Court has reviewed the briefs and the applicable law and heard oral argument on the motion and is now prepared to rule.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

To put this matter in perspective, a brief review of this litigation is appropriate. This multidistrict products liability litigation involves the prescription drug Vioxx, known generically as Rofecoxib. Merck, a New Jersey corporation, researched, designed, manufactured,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Empire Healthchoice Assurance, Inc. v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Manguno v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  5. Acuna v. Brown & Root Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. Hawaii Ex Rel. Louie v. HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Erie Insurance Exchange v. Erie Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  4. Barone v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2019
  5. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. ConwayDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API