Legal Opinion
Ali v. City of Detroit
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided October 15, 1996No. Docket Nos. 179412, 179556 and 180067PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Per curiam
In this negligence action, defendants City of Detroit and its departments (Docket No. 179412), Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation (smart) (Docket No. 180067), and City of Dearborn (Docket No. 179556) appeal by leave granted orders denying their respective motions for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(7) and (C)(10) pursuant to governmental immunity. These appeals have been consolidated. We affirm with respect to defendants City of Detroit and smart, reverse with respect to City of Dearborn, and remand for further proceedings.
Defendants City of Detroit and smart argue…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Booth Newspapers, Inc v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Wade v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Reardon v. Department of Mental HealthMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Scheurman v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- Hickey v. ZezulkaMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Pierce v. City of LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Pitsch v. Ese Michigan, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Pendzsu v. Beazer East, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- Abbott v. John E. Green Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Tellin v. Forsyth TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.