Legal Opinion
Amstelbank, N. V. v. Guaranty Trust Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 28, 1941PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pécora, J,
Defendant moves for an order, pursuant to section 51-a of the Civil Practice Act, permitting it to give notice of the pendency of this action “ to Amstelbank in Holland through Dr. Foltinek as Beheerder thereof, as an adyerse claimant to the moneys claimed in the complaint.”
Plaintiff is a banking corporation organized many years ago and existing under the laws of the Netherlands. Some time in 1932 plaintiff opened a deposit account with defendant which it has maintained continuously since that time. The present action was brought to recover the balance due on that account.
Section…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Moscow Fire Insurance v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Koninklijke Lederfabriek " Oisterwijk " N. V. v. Chase National BankNew York Supreme Court · 1941
- Anderson v. N. V. Transandine HandelmaatschappijAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
3Cited by7 opinions
- Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. VEB Carl Zeiss, JenaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Republic of China v. American Express Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Solicitor for the Affairs of His Majesty's Treasury v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1949
- CHEMACID, SA v. Ferrotar CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
- Eck v. N. V. Nederlandsch Amerikaansche Stoomvaart MaatschappijAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.