Legal Opinion
Bowles v. Trowbridge
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 6, 1945No. 23550-SPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ST. SURE, District Judge.
Plaintiff has proposed written interrogatories to be answered by defendant under Rule 33, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, in an action for injunction and treble damages for alleged violations of section 4(a) of the Emergency Price Control Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 904(a). Defendant objects to the interrogatories on the ground that they are proposed in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, wherein it is provided that “No person * * * shall be compelled in any Criminal Case to be a witness against…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Miller v. Mun. Court of L. A.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Lees v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Bowles v. Glick Bros. Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Charles P. Campbell, Jr., and Elizabeth M. Burke Campbell v. Arthur W. Gerrans, Edward Dennis, and Doe I, Through XCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Allred v. GravesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Porter v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- National Brass Works, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- People v. Superior Court (Kaufman)California Supreme Court · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.