Legal Opinion

Grinnell v. Grinnell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 16, 1932No. 9019PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

1. “A petitioner may dismiss his petition at any time, either in term or vacation, so that he does not thereby prejudice any right of the defendant.” Civil Code (1910), § 5548. There being a cross-action filed by the defendant praying for alimony, the dismissal of the plaintiff’s petition could not in any way affect the right of the wife as defendant to proceed for the affirmative relief prayed for in her cross-action.

2. “A lunatic, or person non compos mentis, having no legal guardian, may sue by any competent person as next friend.” Dent v. Merriam, 113 Ga. 83 (2) (38 S. E. 334); Ross v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ross v. BattleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Dent v. MerriamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Sanders v. HintonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  4. Stanley v. StanleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Archer v. ArcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Parrish v. RigellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  2. Cohen v. CohenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  3. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  4. Kite v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Strickland v. StricklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API