Legal Opinion

Strickland v. Strickland

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 7, 1946No. 15526PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Candler, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) 1. A judgment against an insane person is not void, but voidable. Foster v. Jones, 23 Ga. 168. The record here discloses that no guardian was appointed for the petitioner after he had been adjudged a lunatic or person of unsound mind, but a lunatic may sue by next friend where he has no guardian. Dent v. Merriam, 113 Ga. 83 (38 S. E. 334); Ross v. Battle, 113 Ga. 742 (39 S. E. 287); Stanley v. Stanley, 123 Ga. 122 (51 S. E. 287); Grinnell v. Grinnell, 174 Ga. 904 (164 S. E. 681). And where suit is brought by next friend, the appointment of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Danforth v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  2. Geer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  3. Allams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Reese v. ReeseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  5. Ross v. BattleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Overstreet v. NickelsenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  2. Collins v. CollinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  3. Hagan v. HaganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  4. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  5. Hagan v. HaganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API