Legal Opinion

Leahy v. State Treasurer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 18, 1935No. 24635PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

The parties will be referred to herein as they appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiff commenced this action in the district court to recover a sum of money paid to the state of Oklahoma as income tax for the year 1031, alleging that the amount so paid was illegally assessed against him and collected by the defendants. From a judgment in favor of the defendants, plaintiff has appealed.

The plaintiff is a member of the Osage Tribe of Indians and duly enrolled as such under the Act of Congress of June 28, 1906, and under the authority of said act (34 Stat. 539, 542, sec. 2, par. 7) a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Indian Motocycle Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Choteau v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. United States v. WallerSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Work v. United States Ex Rel. MosierSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Work v. United States Ex Rel. LynnSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leahy v. State Treasurer of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Canary v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  3. McKnight v. PantherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API