Legal Opinion

Canary v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 20, 1956No. 37080PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Chief Justice.

Parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court, except that since Mrs. Canary has no interest in the income in controversy, other than that she, with her husband, made a joint income tax return, we shall hereinafter disregard her as an appellant.

The facts germane to the issues are that Simeon C. Canary, as a ⅞⅜th enrolled Cherokee Indian (citizen), received a tax exempt homestead allotment from which he received income for oil and gas sold therefrom for the years 1949 and 1950, upon which the Oklahoma Tax Commission assessed income tax. The tax was paid…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Graves v. New York Ex Rel. O'KeefeSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Choate v. TrappSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Jones v. MeehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Carpenter v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dooley v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. State Ex Rel. MallinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API