Legal Opinion

Kasser v. Ke

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 28, 1973No. 73-114Published

1Opinion of the Court

PEARSON, Judge.

The plaintiff-appellant was the contract purchaser, and the defendant-appellee, W. Y. Ke, was the contract seller of real property. The appellant brought this action to recover his purchase deposit alleging that he was entitled to recovery because the title to the property was not “good, marketable and insurable”. A trial before the court without jury was conducted resulting in the entry of final judgment for the defendants. Subsequently, upon the plaintiff’s motion for rehearing, the trial court entered its order amending final judgment which found as follows:

“1. This cause…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Miami v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1920
  2. Chamberlain v. LesleySupreme Court of Florida · 1897
  3. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. WorleySupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  4. Boothby v. Gulf Properties of AlabamaSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
  5. Kehl, Et Ux. v. Miami Title Abstract Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API