Legal Opinion
Ferency v. Austin
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided April 21, 1980No. G80-193 CA5PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
INTRODUCTION
DOUGLAS W. HILLMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Zolton Ferency, has filed suit against the Michigan Secretary of State, the State Director of Elections 1 , and the Board of State Canvassers, seeking a declaratory judgment concerning the administration of the Michigan presidential primary election to be held on May 20, 1980. At issue is the constitutionality of the state’s election law as it applies to the Democratic Party, and the authority of the state elections officials to supervise party-run caucuses.
Suit was initially filed on March 20,1980, in Ingham County Circuit…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Associated Builders & Contractors v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Zolton Ferency v. Richard H. Austin, Secretary of State Bernard Apol, Director, Elections Division, Department of State and Board of State CanvassersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Brown v. Wood County Board of ElectionsOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Heitmanis v. AustinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1988
- Ferency v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.