Legal Opinion
Zolton Ferency v. Richard H. Austin, Secretary of State Bernard Apol, Director, Elections Division, Department of State and Board of State Canvassers
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 7, 1981No. 80-1382PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAILEY BROWN, Circuit Judge.
The appellant, Zolton Ferency, an attorney representing himself, and who is “a duly elected and serving precinct delegate, a registered elector and a duly elected and serving member of the Executive Committee of the Ingham County [Michigan] Democratic Committee,” brought this action against the Michigan Secretary of State, the Director of the Election Division of the Department of State and the State Board of Canvassers, appellees, to obtain a declaration that delegates to the Democratic National Convention from Michigan in 1980 must be selected in accordance with…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sweezy v. New Hampshire Ex Rel. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Associated Builders & Contractors v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- In Re JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Heitmanis v. AustinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Kucinich v. Texas Democratic PartyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Heitmanis v. AustinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.