Hampton Dillard v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
BENTON, Judge.
The trial judge convicted Hampton Dillard of forging and uttering a check. On appeal, Dillard contends the trial judge erred in finding the evidence sufficient to support the convictions. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the convictions.
I
On September 28, 1998, William Kevin Clegg, an employee of Wal-Mart Stores, observed Dillard attempting to purchase merchandise at a register. Clegg testified that “[Dillard] proceeded to pull the checkbook out of his pocket ... [and] from a distance, my observations were that he was making hand movement over the checkbook.” After Dillard…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bishop v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Fitzgerald v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Bateman v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
- The People v. KubanekIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. RovinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bennett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
- Morgan Sinclair Goodwin v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2015
- Lindsey Wilcox v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2020