State v. Rovin

OPINION

KRUCKER, Judge.

Appellant Rovin brings this appeal to challenge his conviction of forgery and the sentence of not less than two nor more than three years imposed thereon. He contends that the lower court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal and that the sentence of imprisonment was excessive and an abuse of discretion since the trial court considered improper matters and ignored appellant’s background and prior record.

SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE TO SUSTAIN CONVICTION OF FORGERY

Briefly, the facts most favorable to support the conviction are as follows. Appel…