Legal Opinion

Morgan Sinclair Goodwin v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided February 3, 2015No. 0190143PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECKER, Judge.

Morgan Sinclair Goodwin appeals his three convictions for uttering a public record, in violation of Code § 18.2-168. He argues that the Commonwealth failed to present sufficient evidence to prove that he did anything other than sign three summonses with a false name. The appellant suggests that his actions did not constitute utterings under Virginia law because the evidence failed to prove that he acted with the “purpose of obtaining the [object] mentioned” in the summonses. We hold that the evidence was sufficient to prove that the appellant uttered public records.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cooper v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
  2. Meeks v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  3. Elliott v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  4. Bateman v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
  5. Ramsey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gabriel Santos Alvarez v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  2. Dawn Elizabeth McCullough v. MDM Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2025
  3. Roberto Brito Arrate v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API