Morgan Sinclair Goodwin v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
DECKER, Judge.
Morgan Sinclair Goodwin appeals his three convictions for uttering a public record, in violation of Code § 18.2-168. He argues that the Commonwealth failed to present sufficient evidence to prove that he did anything other than sign three summonses with a false name. The appellant suggests that his actions did not constitute utterings under Virginia law because the evidence failed to prove that he acted with the “purpose of obtaining the [object] mentioned” in the summonses. We hold that the evidence was sufficient to prove that the appellant uttered public records.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cooper v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
- Meeks v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007
- Elliott v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2009
- Bateman v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
- Ramsey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gabriel Santos Alvarez v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- Dawn Elizabeth McCullough v. MDM Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2025
- Roberto Brito Arrate v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2019