Legal Opinion
Cleveland Punch & Shear Works Co. v. E. W. Bliss Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 7, 1944No. 9748-9751PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
Since patents in all four cases relate to drawing presses for shaping large sheet metal structures such as the roofs, fenders, and body panels of automobiles, and since the patents are owned by the Bliss Company and its affiliates, and the alleged infringer is the same in each of the cases, economy of time and space will be served by disposing of them in a single opinion, although they were briefed and argued as separate cases and the single continuous record made below was separated for the purpose of appeal, with a stipulation, however, that the testimony and exhibits…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Dobson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Dean A. Lyon v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Field v. Knowles. Field v. KnowlesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- Timken Detroit Axle Co. v. Cleveland Steel Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- Brown & Sharpe Mfg. Co. v. Kar Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1946
- W. E. Plechaty Co. v. Heckett Engineering, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.