Legal Opinion
Universal Fidelity LP v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 13, 2006No. 05-602CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
HODGES, Judge.
Universal Fidelity has applied for attorney’s fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act sustained in connection with its bid protest against the United States. Prior to our issuing an opinion in the underlying litigation, the Government notified the court of its intention to cancel the challenged solicitation. We dismissed the Complaint without prejudice to plaintiffs right to file a related lawsuit if the new solicitation had the same or similar concerns that prompted the original protest.
Defendant argues that plaintiff was not the “prevailing party”…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hong-Yee Chiu v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Gavette v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dellew Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- United Partition Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Martinez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Dellew Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Ryan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.