Sherod v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, Presiding Judge.
OPINION
From his conviction of murder in the second degree with an automobile and sentence to ten years’ imprisonment, Fred Edward Sherod, the defendant, appeals in error. His appellate counsel are different *862from his trial counsel. Throughout the proceedings he has had retained counsel.
By his first assignment of error, Sherod says the murder conviction should be set aside because the indictment did not charge that he killed the deceased with malice aforethought. This question is raised in this court for the first time.
The indictment charges that the defendant did…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Huffman v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
- Corlew v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
- Warden v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
- Edwards v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
- Witt v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1868
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. AdkissonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
- Campbell v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
- McCracken v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
- State v. MorrisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.