Legal Opinion

Kimbrough & Co. v. Schmitt

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided September 6, 1996PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGHERS, Judge.

The principal issue in this case is whether a liquidated damages provision in a contract for deed was properly struck down in the court below.

I. Facts

In 1988, Lawrence Schmitt, appellee, contracted to buy residential property located at 6511 Rocky Park in Memphis, Tennessee, from Kimbrough & Co. for $72,450.00. The terms of the contract provided that the financing period would expire at the end of three years. Three years following the execution of the contract, the parties agreed to renew the contract based on the then-existing sales price of $71,658.57. Schmitt made payments…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Airline Construction, Inc. v. BarrCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  2. V. L. Nicholson Co. v. Transcon Investment & Financial Ltd.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  3. City of Bristol v. BostwickTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Railroad v. Cabinet Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Turner v. BensonTennessee Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Guiliano v. Cleo, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Vanderbilt University v. Gerry DinardoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. Shoney's, Inc. v. MorrisDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1999
  4. Charles Crews v. Dexter Road PartnersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  5. Guliano v. CleoTennessee Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API