Legal Opinion

Wall v. Macfield/Unifi

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 29, 1998No. COA98-285PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Chief Judge.

First we consider whether the Full Commission erred in reversing the deputy commissioner’s award to plaintiff and concluding that plaintiff’s claim was time barred under G.S. 97-24. Plaintiff argues that the Industrial Commission does not have jurisdiction over plaintiff’s claim until the employer has filed an accident report with the Commission. After careful review, we disagree.

G.S. 97-24 states that “[t]he right to compensation under this Article shall be forever barred unless the claim be filed with the Industrial Commission within two years after the accident.” North…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Belfield v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Reinhardt v. Women's Pavilion, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Craver v. Dixie Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Weston v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Craver v. Dixie Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gore v. Myrtle/MuellerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Griffith v. Goodwill Indus.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API