Barket v. City of St. Louis
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DOWD, Judge.
Plaintiffs, Keith Barket, et al., appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant, the City of St. Louis (City). We reverse and remand.
Plaintiffs are the owners of promissory notes issued by P.D. St. Louis Associates, L.P. (Mortgagor). The promissory notes in question were issued on March 2, 1981, and are secured by deeds of trust on real property located in the City known as the Arcade Building. On December 20, 1979, the City, through its Heritage and Urban Design Commission (HUDC), declared the Arcade Building to be a landmark under the provisions…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Morgan v. WillmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
- Brinson v. WhitticoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Guaranty Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- Terry v. CB Contracting CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- HOME BUILDERS OF ASS'N OF GREATER ST. LOUIS v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- Planned Industrial Expansion Authority of Kansas City v. Ivanhoe Neighborhood CouncilMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Wedgewood Square Ctr. Ltd. Partnership v. Lincoln Land Title Co. Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007