Hoops v. Tate
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.
Plaintiffs own a store building in Pomona which they leased to four defendants, husbands and wives.
The lease was for a term of 10 years. Defendants proposed to, and did operate a retail ladies’ ready-to-wear store on the leased premises.
Differences as to the conduct of the business arose among the parties. One of the couples sold out to the other couple, and retired from the business. No written assignment of the lease was made, nor were the premises sublet.
Plaintiffs served defendants with notice terminating the tenancy, and demanded possession of the store.
The demand being refused,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cousins Investment Co. v. Hastings Clothing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Spangler v. SpanglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Adelstein v. GreenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. BuhlingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Percoff v. SolomonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Republic Pictures Corp. v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Borgen v. WiglesworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
- Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985