Legal Opinion

Dickman v. McClellan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 3, 1939PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The case made out by the pleadings and the master’s findings is essentially this: The defendant held the plaintiff’s note for $3,000, secured by a mortgage on the plaintiff’s real estate. At a time when the full amount was admittedly due and payable the plaintiff paid the defendant $2,100 upon an oral agreement between the parties that such payment should cancel the entire indebtedness. The defendant thereupon gave to the plaintiff a discharge of the mortgage under seal in statutory form wherein, after identi*88fying the mortgage, he acknowledged “satisfaction of the same.” G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Glass v. HulbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Dodge v. Anna Jaques HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. MacLeod v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Landrum v. Trowbridge, Dwight & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  5. Stoneham Five Cents Savings Bank v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Franz v. FranzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Mickelson v. BarnetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  3. Abalan v. AbalanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  4. Weld v. TraftonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  5. Keith v. KeithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API