Legal Opinion

Curry-Bey v. Jackson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 5, 1976No. Civ. A. 76-170PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FLANNERY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs are prisoners at Lorton Correctional Complex who challenge the authority of prison officials to order their transfer, without a fact-finding hearing, to federal penal and correctional institutions in other states for disciplinary reasons. During the progress of this litigation, the Supreme Court decided two cases having an important bearing on the validity of plaintiffs’ claims. Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. 215, 96 S.Ct. 2532, 49 L.Ed.2d 451 (1976); Montanye v. Haymes, 427 U.S. 236, 96 S.Ct. 2543, 49 L.Ed.2d 466 (1976). Subsequent to those…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Davis v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. District of Columbia v. CooperDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Michael Cosgrove v. William French Smith, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  5. Larry Cannon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API