Legal Opinion

Weston v. Kim's Dollar Store

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 8, 2012No. 27155PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kittredge

We granted a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals’ decision in this matter. Weston v. Kim’s Dollar Store, 385 S.C. 520, 684 S.E.2d 769 (Ct.App.2009). Petitioner Monica Weston purchased a pair of prescription decorative, colored contact lenses without a prescription from Respondent Kim’s Dollar Store, an unauthorized seller. The lenses were manufactured by Respondent CIBA Vision (CIBA). Petitioner developed an eye infection which led to the loss of vision in her left eye. Thereafter, Petitioner brought an action against Kim’s Dollar Store and CIBA alleging six causes of action.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. National Meat Assn. v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Wortman v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Epstein v. Coastal Timber Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  5. Byers v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barber v. BarberCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
  2. Chandelle Property Owners Association v. James Douglas ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2024
  3. Cynthia Wright v. SCDOTCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2022
  4. Red Bluff Trade Center, LLC v. Horry CountyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API