Legal Opinion

People v. Davenport

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 1998No. Docket 204980PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was charged with carjacking, MCL 750.529a; MSA 28.797(a). At trial, the defense requested a jury instruction on specific intent, contending that the carjacking statute implicitly required a showing of specific intent (1) to deprive the victim of the automobile, and (2) to put the victim in fear. The trial court initially refused to give a specific intent instruction. Following defendant’s conviction, however, the trial court granted defendant’s motion for a new trial on the basis that it should have instructed the jury on the element of specific intent. The prosecution appeals by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. LardieMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. American Medical Centers of Michigan, Ltd.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. QuinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. TerryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. People v. GreenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. State v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  3. People v. HenryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. People v. FennellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. People v. MaynorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API