People v. Davenport
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Defendant was charged with carjacking, MCL 750.529a; MSA 28.797(a). At trial, the defense requested a jury instruction on specific intent, contending that the carjacking statute implicitly required a showing of specific intent (1) to deprive the victim of the automobile, and (2) to put the victim in fear. The trial court initially refused to give a specific intent instruction. Following defendant’s conviction, however, the trial court granted defendant’s motion for a new trial on the basis that it should have instructed the jury on the element of specific intent. The prosecution appeals by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. LardieMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. American Medical Centers of Michigan, Ltd.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. QuinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. TerryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- People v. GreenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- State v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. HenryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. FennellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. MaynorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.