Doggett, Bassett, Hills & Co. v. Stevens
Supreme Court of Kansas
Errof from Phillips District Court. Action by Doggett;Bassett, Hills & Co. against Bell & Stevens, and 'George Bell and A. F. Stevens, to recover $383.05 on an account for goods sold and delivered. The plaintiffs obtained an order of attachment, which was levied upon a stock of goods as the property of .defendant, George Bell.
Read the full summary
Errof from Phillips District Court. Action by Doggett;Bassett, Hills & Co. against Bell & Stevens, and 'George Bell and A. F. Stevens, to recover $383.05 on an account for goods sold and delivered. The plaintiffs obtained an order of attachment, which was levied upon a stock of goods as the property of .defendant, George Bell. Defendant Bell filed his motion to discharge the attachment, which motion came on for hearing January 5,1884, before the district judge, Hon. W. H. Pratt, at chambers. January 12,1884, the judge sustained the motion and dissolved the attachment. This ruling and order…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
On December 12,1883, the plaintiffs commenced their action against the defendants to recover the sum of $383.05 on an account for goods sold and delivered. On the same day, they filed their affidavit for attachment, alleging as a ground thérefor that the defendants were about to assign, remove and dispose of their property or a part thereof, with the intent to defraud, hinder and delay their creditors. The *299attachment was levied .upon a stock of goods as the property of the defendant, George Bell The defendant Bell filed his motion to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lampson v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
- Tennent v. BatteySupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Seibert v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Dodd v. Hills & KramerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
- Urquhart v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bank of Inman v. GravesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- McComb v. WattSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Salmon v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892