Salmon v. Mills
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to United States Court for Indian Territory.
1Opinion of the Court
Shiras, District Judge.
On the 2d day of May, 1889, the plaintiff in error filed in the United States court for the Indian Territory a complaint at law, wherein he sought judgment against Abraham and Jackson Mills for the sum of $9,983, claimed to be due on two promissory notes, and in aid of such action he sued out a writ of attachment against the property of the defendants above named. The grounds alleged for the issuance of the attachment were set forth in the affidavit accompanying the complaint in the following form;
“That said Abraham Mills and Jackson Mills are about to remove, and have…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- First National Bank v. RandallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Keith v. ArmstrongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Nolen v. RoystonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
- Smith-Frazer Boot & Shoe Co. v. DerseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- Rogers v. CooperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Choctaw, O. G. R. Co. v. BurgessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Salmon v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895