Legal Opinion

Schumann v. Crook

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided February 19, 1943PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner

Reversing.

As shown in Crook v. Schumann et al., 292 Ky. 750, 167 S. W. (2d) 836, we affirmed in part and reversed in part judgments that the appellants were guilty of civil contempt in refusing to respond to subpoenas duces tecum and to obey orders of the court to produce and exhibit certain records of the S. L. Crook Corporation. And as shown in an opinion delivered today dismissing' a cross-appeal of Schumann, et al., in a case of the same style designated as Case No. 2, 293 Ky. 334, 168 S. W. (2d) 1004, the circuit court sustained a demurrer to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crook v. SchumannCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  2. Otis-Hidden Company v. ScheirichCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1920
  3. Pilcher v. StadlerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  4. Mann v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  5. Crook v. SchumannCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crook v. SchumannCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  2. Schumann v. CrookCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  3. Maynard v. ChrismanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API