Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Polson v. Hardcastle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1912No. 9632PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for Skagit county, Joiner, J., entered October 26, 1910, upon findings after a trial to the court, in proceedings to mandamus city officers.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

The relator, Paul Poison, as assignee, is owner and holder of two general fund warrants of Anacortes, a city of the third class; -one for $449.50, dated June 13, 1892, and one for $450.50, dated July 18, 1892. These warrants were presented to the city treasurer and by him indorsed “Not paid for want of funds.” They are still unpaid, and bear interest from the date of their presentation at the rate of ten per cent per annum. On April 29, 1910, the relator commenced this action in the superior court of Skagit county, for a writ of mandamus, directed to the treasurer, mayor, and council of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eidemiller v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bowen v. Department of Social SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Intermela v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
  3. Johnson v. McGrawWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. City of Tacoma v. PerkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Wm. P. Harper & Son v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API