Latta v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CAPPY, Justice.
The question before this Court is whether a claimant seeking reinstatement of workmen’s compensation benefits currently under suspension must present expert medical evidence in order to establish that the work-related injury that gave rise to the benefits under suspension continues.1 We hold that expert medical evidence is not necessary to establish that the work-related injury continues. Rather, once a claimant testifies that his work-related injury continues, the burden shifts to his employer to prove the contrary. Where an employer fails to present…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Latta v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Latta v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
3Cited by4 opinions
- Latta v. WCAB (Latrobe Die Casting Co.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Graphic Packaging, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Timcho v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Sweeney v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Whitman's Chocolates)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997