Legal Opinion

Bartlett v. MacRae

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 2, 1981No. L11300 CA 17868PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

In this action for wrongful death, plaintiff sought recovery on three theories: (1) strict liability; (2) negligence per se under the Oregon Hazardous Substances Act, ORS 453.035 and ORS 453.085; and (3) negligence. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict on the strict liability and negligence per se counts. On the simple negligence count the jury found defendant 30% and decedent 70% negligent. Plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

Plaintiff’s husband died as a result of accidentally drinking poisonous dye used to mark cattle. The dye was prepared by defendant, a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Heaton v. Ford Motor Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Timber Access Industries Co. v. U. S. Plywood-Champion Papers, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Harris v. Northwest Natural Gas Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Allen v. Heil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Bowlds v. Taggesell Pontiac Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fackler v. GenetzkyNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Vandeveere-Pratt v. Portland Habilitation Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Kreski v. Modern Wholesale Electric Supply Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. 38 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 183, prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,408 Patsy S. Glover, Personal Representative of the Estate of Roy Guy Weaver, (Deceased) v. The Bic Corporation, Patsy S. Glover, Personal Representative of the Estate of Roy Guy Weaver, (Deceased) v. The Bic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API