Bell v. City of Valdosta
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
The accused was convicted in the recorder’s court of the city of Yaldosta of '“purchasing intoxicating liquors.” An ordinance of the city made it a criminal offense “for any person to purchase, or barter for, any intoxicating liquors, within the corporate limits” of the city. The ordinance further provided that the possession of such liquors by any person in the city “shall be prima facie evidence” that such person had purchased the liquors, or bartered for them, within the corporate limits of the city, in violation of the ordinance. The undisputed evidence was that the accused had in his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Duren v. City of ThomasvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Bolton v. City of NewnanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Hood v. Mayor of GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Moore v. City of ThomasvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Hardy v. Mayor of EatontonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. City of ValdostaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Campbell v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Stafford v. City of ValdostaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934