Brown v. City of Valdosta
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.
1. An attack upon an ordinance “upon the grounds that it is unconstitutional and void, and is in conflict with a statute of this State, ■ which attack is not sustained by the trial court, does not render such judgment void; and the defendant, when convicted, could sue out a writ of certiorari to correct any errors committed by the trial judge in sustaining the constitutionality and validity of the ordinance. Having jurisdiction of the subject-matter, and of the person of the defendant, the judgment of the trial court, finding the defendant guilty and imposing punishment, was not void, even if…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Griggs v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. GillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Sawyer v. City of BlakelyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Carswell v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Griggs v. City of MaconSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Cedartown v. PickettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Stafford v. City of ValdostaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Courson v. LandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936