Legal Opinion

Duren v. City of Thomasville

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 22, 1906PublishedCited by 48 opinions

Petition for certiorari. Before Judge Mitchell. Thomas superior court. December 26, 1905.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

Duren was convicted, in the mayor’s court of Thomas-ville, of having on hand for sale certain intoxicating liquors. He applied to the judge of the superior court for a writ of certiorari, alleging, that the verdict was contrary to the evidence; that the mayor erred in refusing to allow him a trial by jury, and in refusing to exclude certain evidence; and that the verdict was contrary to law, in that the ordinance under which he was convicted was void. The certiorari was denied, and Duren excepted.

1. There is no merit in the contention of the accused that he was entitled to be tried by a jury.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Evans v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Dozier v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. Hood v. Mayor of GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  5. Little v. Mayor of Fort ValleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Calhoun v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. State v. GriffinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  3. Loeb v. JenningsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Callaway v. MimsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  5. Hughes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API