Legal Opinion
Daugherty v. Sheer
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2015-2034PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TANYA S. CHUTEAN, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs Michael Daugherty and LabMD, Inc. bring this Bivens action against Alain Sheer, Ruth Yodaiken, and Carl Settlemyer, individuals employed by the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), alleging that they are liable for violating, and conspiring to violate, Plaintiffs’ First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendment rights. (Compl. ¶¶ 153-73). Defendants have moved to dismiss under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 13). For the reasons stated herein, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
I.…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Michael J. Daugherty & Labmd, Inc. v. SheerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018