Legal Opinion
Evans v. Atwood
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 18, 1997No. CIV. A. 96-2746 (RMU) (JMF)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
Nature of the Case
Plaintiffs in this class action claim they lost their jobs in a reduction in force (“RIF”) at the United States Agency for International Development (“AID”) because of their age. The matter comes before the undersigned magistrate judge on the plaintiffs’ motion to compel discovery.1
Discovery Disputes
The parties have reached an impasse as to four discovery issues. The most complicated, by far, is whether the attorney-client and attorney work product privileges protect from discovery documents which the defendants…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Tax Analysts v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Athridge v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Mitchell v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- United States v. NaegeleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Banks v. Office of Senate Sergeant-At-ArmsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Eugene Burger Management Corp. v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.