Legal Opinion
Gage v. HSM ELECTRONIC PROTECTION SERVICES, INC.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided September 14, 2011No. 10-2545PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BYE, Circuit Judge.
Christine Gage purchased a security alarm for her home in 2006 from HSM Electronic Protection Services, Inc. (“HSM”), which was later purchased by Stanley Convergent Security Solutions (“Stanley”). In 2008, Stanley received a low-temperature alarm from Gage’s home but failed to contact Gage or any of the contacts listed on her account. A few months later, the low temperature caused a pipe to burst resulting in significant damage to the home. Gage sued Stanley claiming Stanley did not respond properly to the alarm and therefore is liable for over $250,000 in damages for…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Altman v. AronsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Pye v. Nu Aire, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Fonda v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- State v. BolsingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Miller v. Redwood Toxicology Laboratory, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- COCKRAM v. Genesco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Gilliland v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2014
- Keller v. City of FremontDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2012
- E3 Biofuels, LLC v. Biothane, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.