Legal Opinion
Goldrick v. D. M. Picton Co.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided August 19, 1971No. Civ. A. No. 195-71-NPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KELLAM, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a member of the crew of the SS PORT ARTHUR, owned and operated by D. M. Picton Company, asserts he was injured aboard the defendant’s ves*640sel on or about August 11, 1970. Service of process was obtained by serving the State Corporation Commission of Virginia. Defendant moves to quash and vacate such service upon the ground that defendant is a foreign corporation with offices in Texas, that it is not doing business in the Commonwealth of Virginia, and that the cause of action did not arise out of any business done in the Commonwealth.
The facts…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Superior Oil Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1978
- Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Procter & Gamble CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1973
- Pennington v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1983
- Consolidated Engineering Co. v. Southern Steel Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.