Legal Opinion

Palmer v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1925No. 4267PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The points elaborately argued in the brief for plaintiff in error are largely raised for the first time in this court, and those cannot be considered.

The indictment charges that Palmer was informed against “as a first offense,” and pleaded guilty of possession (section 3, title 2, National Prohibition Act [Comp. St. *146Ann. Supp. 1923, § 10138%aa]), August 12, 1922; that on March 5, 1923, he had a further information filed against him “as a second offense” for possession of intoxicating liquor, and was convicted on March 12, 1923; and charges that the third offense for which this indictment was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mathieu v. George A. Moore & Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Keen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  2. United States ex rel. Derencz v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
  3. Keen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API