Palmer v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
The points elaborately argued in the brief for plaintiff in error are largely raised for the first time in this court, and those cannot be considered.
The indictment charges that Palmer was informed against “as a first offense,” and pleaded guilty of possession (section 3, title 2, National Prohibition Act [Comp. St. *146Ann. Supp. 1923, § 10138%aa]), August 12, 1922; that on March 5, 1923, he had a further information filed against him “as a second offense” for possession of intoxicating liquor, and was convicted on March 12, 1923; and charges that the third offense for which this indictment was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mathieu v. George A. Moore & Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1925
3Cited by3 opinions
- Keen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- United States ex rel. Derencz v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
- Keen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926