Legal Opinion
Mathieu v. George A. Moore & Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 13, 1925No. 16643PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARTRIDGE, District Judge.
This is an action for breach of contract to accept and pay for 200 tons of Indo-Chinese sugar, and also for the sum of 15,000 piastres ($19,500), money expended by plaintiff for defendant’s account. . The defendant has filed a cross-complaint, seeking to recover $75,000 damages for the breach of another sugar contract, and for $1,456,33 money advanced. The contract upon which the suit was brought consisted of certain cablegrams between the plaintiff in .Saigon and the defendant in San Francisco. Those cables refer to the subject-matter as “sucre indigene brun,” the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gossler v. Eagle Sugar RefineryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Beck v. . SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Baltimore & L. Ry. Co. v. Steel Rail Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
- Evanston Elevator & Coal Co. v. CastnerU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1904
- United States Smelting Co. v. American Galvanizing Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1916
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rhone-Poulenc Incorporated v. International Insurance Company and International Surplus Lines Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Palmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
- United States ex rel. Derencz v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930