Legal Opinion
Perez v. Monmouth Cable Vision
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 23, 1994PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
278 N.J. Super. 275 (1994)
650 A.2d 1025
MILTON PEREZ, PETITIONER-APPELLEE,
v.
MONMOUTH CABLE VISION, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 7, 1994.
Decided December 23, 1994.
Before Judges SHEBELL and KLEINER.
Francis T. Giuliano argued the cause for respondent-appellant (Mr. Giuliano, on the brief).
Richard Kushinsky argued the cause for petitioner-appellee (Kushinsky, Gans & Chaplick, attorneys; Louis S. Scalzo, on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered by SHEBELL, P.J.A.D.
Petitioner, Milton Perez, filed two Workers' Compensation Claim…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Close v. Kordulak Bros.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Perez v. Pantasote, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Saunderlin v. E.I. Dupont Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- De Angelo v. Alsan Masons Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Fiore v. Consolidated FreightwaysSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Lindquist v. City of Jersey City Fire DepartmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Kertesz v. KorshNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Hanrahan v. Township of SpartaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- Natalie Bellino v. Verizon WirelessNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.