Legal Opinion

City of Atlanta v. Mapel

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 12, 1970No. 45047PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

•Hall, Presiding Judge.

“The American rules governing the tort liability of municipal corporations make a curious patchwork of immunity and responsibility. The dominent motif is a supposed distinction between governmental and proprietary functions. . . No satisfactory test has been devised for distinguishing [between these] functions. . . Little wonder that courts and commentators have despaired of finding a rational and consistent key to the distinction.” 2 Harper & James, The Law of Torts 1619-1623, § 29.6.

Probably as both cause and effect of this pattern, there has been a definite trend…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Town of Fort Oglethorpe v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  2. Cornelisen v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  3. Plaza v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. City of Warrenton v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  5. Stubbs v. City of MacOnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Robinson v. City of DecaturSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  2. Weaver v. City of StatesboroCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Cleghorn v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Radford v. MAYOR & ALDERMEN OF SAVANNAHCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. Johnson v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API