City of Atlanta v. Mapel
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
•Hall, Presiding Judge.
“The American rules governing the tort liability of municipal corporations make a curious patchwork of immunity and responsibility. The dominent motif is a supposed distinction between governmental and proprietary functions. . . No satisfactory test has been devised for distinguishing [between these] functions. . . Little wonder that courts and commentators have despaired of finding a rational and consistent key to the distinction.” 2 Harper & James, The Law of Torts 1619-1623, § 29.6.
Probably as both cause and effect of this pattern, there has been a definite trend…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Town of Fort Oglethorpe v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- Cornelisen v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Plaza v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- City of Warrenton v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Stubbs v. City of MacOnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Robinson v. City of DecaturSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Weaver v. City of StatesboroCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Cleghorn v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Radford v. MAYOR & ALDERMEN OF SAVANNAHCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Johnson v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.