Legal Opinion

Grimes v. Rave Motion Pictures Birmingham, L.L.C.

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided May 28, 2008No. Civil Action 07-AR-1397-S, 07-AR-1930-S, 07-AR-2154-S, 07-AR-2043-SPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WILLIAM M. ACKER, JR., District Judge.

All four of the above-entitled cases are assigned to the undersigned. They have the following other common features, making them cookie-cutter cases:

1. Each is based on an alleged violation by a vendor of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (“FACTA”)/ 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681c(g), and 1681n, the statutory provisions that have spawned so much litigation in federal courts that the multi-district panel has recently picked two competing transferee courts to handle it. See In re Oilily Fair & Accurate Credit Transactions Act Litig., 545…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Meehan v. Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
  4. In Re Oilily Fair & Accur. Credit Trans. Act Lit.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2008
  5. In Re: Texas Roadhouse (Facta) LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2008

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Grimes v. Rave Motion Pictures Birmingham, L.L.C.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2010
  2. Ashby v. Farmers Ins. Co. of OregonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2008
  3. In Re Farmers Insurance Co., Inc., FCRA LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2010
  4. Irvine v. 233 SKYDECK, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  5. Rosenthal v. Longchamp Coral Gables LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API