Legal Opinion
Biomet, Inc. v. Barnes & Thornburg
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 8, 2003No. 02A05-0205-CV-197PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRIEDLANDER, Judge.
Biomet, Inc. appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Barnes & Thornburg (B & T) in an action for legal malpractice. 1 Biomet raises the following restated issues for review:
1. Did the trial court err in determining that the statute of limitations should not be tolled until the conclusion of the patent infringement litigation brought by Pedro Ramos against Biomet?
2. Did Biomet, as a matter of law, release B & T for any alleged failure to properly represent Biomet’s interest, including its disclosure to DePuy, Inc. (DePuy) of privileged…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- John A. Bott and Jac Products, Inc. v. Four Star Corporation, a Michigan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Wall v. LewisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Strutz v. McNagnyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- R.D.H. Communications, Ltd. v. WinstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Best Choice Fund, LLC v. Low & Childers, P.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Bambi's Roofing, Inc. v. MoriartyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Jason T. Myers v. Thomas D. Maxson Amy L. Hutchison Bruce W. Graham and Trueblood & Graham (In their Official and Individual Capacities) (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Dickes v. FelgerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Price v. Charles Brown Charitable Remainder Unitrust TrustIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.