State v. Danforth
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
Stephen Danforth was convicted of first-degree criminal sexual conduct for sexually abusing J.S., a six-year-old boy. Danforth appealed his conviction and the state appealed the sentence; the appeals were consolidated.
Danforth asserts that irregularities during jury deliberations deprived him of a fair trial. Danforth also argues that the district court erred in admitting a videotaped interview of J.S., after finding J.S. incompetent to testify at trial, because the videotape constituted hearsay that violated his right to confrontation. Finally, Danforth claims that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- In Re BlodgettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. LanamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. KelleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. O'HAGANCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Danforth v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Danforth v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Danforth v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Danforth v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. GrossmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.